Skip to Main Content
COM5EJ305 • Co-operative Theory & Practice
Module 2
Calicut University • B.Com • Semester 5 • Elective

Module II: Origin of Cooperative Movement in India & Cooperative Principles

Course Code: COM5EJ305 (3) • Co-operative Theory and Practice

Module II Syllabus Architecture & Core Jurisprudence

Module II presents an exhaustive academic investigation into three foundational pillars of cooperative jurisprudence and history: 1. Brief History of Cooperative Movement in India: From pre-colonial indigenous institutions (Nidhis, Chit Funds, Phad system) through colonial agrarian distress, Sir Frederick Nicholson's epochal mission (“Find Raiffeisen”), the landmark 1904 and 1912 Acts, Maclagan Committee (1914), Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919), Royal Commission on Agriculture (1928), post-independence All India Rural Credit Survey Committee (Gorwala Report 1954), Vaidyanathan Committee reforms, the 97th Constitutional Amendment Act (2011), to the formation of the Union Ministry of Cooperation (2021); 2. Evolutionary Stages of Cooperative Principles: Rigorous comparative analysis across four historic stages—Rochdale Pioneers (1844), First ICA Reformulation (Paris 1937), Karve Committee Reformulation (Vienna 1966), and the Fourth Stage Manchester Declaration (1995 Statement on the Cooperative Identity comprising 7 modern principles, core values, and ethical tenets); 3. International Cooperative Alliance (ICA): Genesis (1895 London), statutory objectives, consultative role with the United Nations, global membership hierarchy, and four-tier administrative and sectoral governance architecture.

Unit 2.1: Historical Evolution of the Cooperative Movement in India

1. Pre-Colonial Indigenous Mutual Aid Systems

Cooperation in India is not merely an imported European administrative device; its foundational spirit has permeated the subcontinent's socio-economic fabric for millennia. Ancient Sanskrit literature celebrated collective endeavors through institutions such as Gram Sanghas (village republics), Srenis (guilds of artisans and merchants operating under customary bylaws), and Kula (communal clan-based mutual support networks).

In the pre-statutory modern period, traditional mutual credit institutions spontaneously emerged to mitigate localized agrarian crises:

Nidhis and Chit Funds (Southern India)

Mutual loan funds founded in Madras Presidency during the mid-19th century, where members pooled monthly subscriptions to provide low-interest credit and bid-based advances to subscribers, bypassing unorganized moneylenders.

Phad System (Maharashtra)

A sophisticated community-managed irrigation and agricultural cooperative system in Kolhapur and Khandesh, where farmers collectively diverted perennial stream water, shared sugarcane cultivation expenses, and pooled market yields.

Lana and Gonchi Systems (Northern India)

Communal labor and bullock pooling arrangements in Punjab and Rajasthan during seasonal plowing and harvesting cycles, demonstrating organic, unwritten cooperative mutualism.

2. Agrarian Distress, Moneylender Exploitation, and Colonial Impetus

The advent of British colonial land revenue settlements—specifically the Permanent Settlement (Zamindari) in Bengal, the Ryotwari System in Madras and Bombay, and the Mahalwari System in the North-West—fundamentally transformed rural India. Land revenue was made fixed, payable strictly in cash, and rigidly enforced regardless of seasonal monsoons, crop failures, or price depressions.

Peasants were driven into the clutches of village moneylenders (Sahukars, Mahajans, and Banias), who levied exorbitant interest rates ranging between 36 percent and 100 percent per annum. Through compound usury, fraudulent accounting, and land mortgage foreclosures under British civil courts, agriculturalists were systematically dispossessed of their ancestral lands, reducing self-sufficient yeoman cultivators to indebted serfs and landless tenants.

Historical Flashpoint: The Deccan Riots of 1875 & Early Legislative Remedies

In 1875, agrarian resentment against moneylenders exploded across Pune and Ahmednagar districts of Maharashtra in the historic Deccan Riots. Indebted ryots attacked the residences and shops of moneylenders, seizing and burning debt bonds, promissory contracts, and court decree records.

The colonial administration responded by enacting the Deccan Agriculturists' Relief Act of 1879, followed by the Land Improvement Loans Act of 1883 (Taccavi long-term loans for wells and bunding) and the Agriculturists' Loans Act of 1884 (short-term loans for seeds and bullocks). However, these state loans proved hopelessly inadequate, riddled with bureaucratic delays, bribery, and rigid recovery tactics. The colonial state recognized that external administrative relief could not substitute for self-reliant, community-rooted credit institutions.

3. Sir Frederick Nicholson's Report and the Slogan “Find Raiffeisen”

In 1892, the Government of Madras appointed Sir Frederick Augustus Nicholson, an enlightened British civil servant, on special deputation to study agricultural and land banks across Europe—particularly in Germany, Italy, and France—and recommend a viable model for rural credit in India.

Nicholson submitted his magnum opus in two monumental volumes published in 1895 and 1897. His fundamental thesis was that the small peasant economy of India bore an exact structural resemblance to rural Germany prior to F.W. Raiffeisen's reforms. Nicholson condensed the entire solution to India's rural debt misery into two immortal words:

Sir Frederick Nicholson's Historical Dictum (1895)Madras Government Report
“FIND RAIFFEISEN”

Core Policy Conclusions of the Nicholson Report:

  • Mutual Knowledge & Proximity: Credit institutions must operate within a tightly circumscribed local area (single village) so that members possess intimate personal knowledge of each other's character, assets, and repayment capacities.
  • Unlimited Liability: Members must assume joint and several unlimited liability to foster collective vigilance, prevent reckless borrowing, and inspire depositor confidence.
  • Honorary Management: Administrative overheads must be eliminated by utilizing honorary village leadership, avoiding costly bureaucratic payrolls.
  • Capital Formation through Thrift: Credit must not be an act of external charity; it must be accumulated through regular village thrift, small deposits, and retained permanent reserve funds.

Simultaneously in Northern India, H. Dupernex, an Indian Civil Service officer in the United Provinces, published an influential treatise titled “People's Banks for Northern India” (1900), advocating the establishment of urban credit societies modeled on Schulze-Delitzsch and Luzzatti banks. Lord Curzon's administration appointed a committee chaired by Sir Edward Law in 1901 to draft comprehensive legislation, leading directly to the birth of statutory cooperation in India.

4. The Co-operative Credit Societies Act, 1904 & The Co-operative Societies Act, 1912

On March 25, 1904, the Governor-General of India, Lord Curzon, gave assent to the Co-operative Credit Societies Act (Act X of 1904). This historic statute marked the formal, legislative inauguration of the cooperative movement in India.

Co-operative Credit Societies Act, 1904

Act X of 1904
  • Sole Credit Focus: Confined strictly to credit societies; formation of non-credit cooperatives (marketing, farming, consumer) was legally impermissible.
  • Rural vs Urban Dichotomy: Classified societies into Rural (where at least 80% of members were agriculturalists) and Urban (where non-agriculturalists formed over 80%).
  • Liability Principle: Rural societies were mandatorily based on unlimited liability; urban societies could choose between limited or unlimited liability.
  • Statutory Authority: Created the distinct provincial office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies (RCS), endowed with wide powers of registration, audit, inspection, and dissolution.
  • Inherent Limitations: Neglected non-credit sectors, provided no legal framework for central financing federations (CCBs/SCBs), and fostered excessive officialization.

Co-operative Societies Act, 1912

Act II of 1912
  • Legalization of Non-Credit Cooperatives: Authorized the registration of any society having as its object the promotion of economic interests of members—sanctioning marketing, purchasing, dairy, and weavers' societies.
  • Creation of Multi-Tier Federal Structures: Legally recognized central financing and supervising unions, paving the way for Central Co-operative Banks (CCBs) at the district level and Apex State Co-operative Banks (SCBs).
  • Modern Liability Classification: Replaced the rigid urban-rural dichotomy with a rational distinction based on liability: limited liability for federations and urban societies, unlimited for primary rural credit.
  • Reserve Fund Mandate: Mandated that every society must carry at least 25% of net annual profit to a statutory indivisible Reserve Fund before paying dividends.
  • Shareholding Ceiling: Restricted individual shareholding to a maximum of one-fifth (20%) of total share capital, or a nominal value of ₹1,000.

5. Landmark Committees & Provincial Autonomy (1914–1928)

1914–1915

Maclagan Committee

Headed by Sir Edward Maclagan. Formulated 5 cardinal principles: rigorous member selection, insistence on punctual repayment, loan sizing to actual repayment capacity, systematic annual audits and supervision, and accumulation of strong unencumbered reserve funds.

1919 Dyarchy

Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms

Cooperation was declared a “Transferred Subject” under provincial ministers. Triggered independent provincial legislation: Bombay Act 1925 (first province to pass its own Act), Madras Act 1932, Bihar & Orissa Act 1935, and Bengal Act 1940.

1928 Linlithgow

Royal Commission on Agriculture

Delivered the immortal verdict that guided all subsequent national policy: “If cooperation fails, there fails the best hope of rural India.” Emphasized that despite defects, cooperative mutualism remained the only viable vehicle for peasant emancipation.

6. Post-Independence Transformation to the Present Era

All India Rural Credit Survey Committee (AIRCSC, 1954)A.D. Gorwala Committee
“COOPERATION HAS FAILED, BUT COOPERATION MUST SUCCEED!” • 3.1% COOPERATIVE CREDIT IN 1951

In 1951, the RBI appointed the AIRCSC chaired by A.D. Gorwala (with Prof. D.R. Gadgil). The report revealed that after 50 years of cooperation, cooperatives supplied a miserable 3.1% of total rural credit, while private moneylenders and traders controlled over 92%. The Committee formulated the revolutionary Integrated Scheme of Rural Credit based on three pillars:

  • State Partnership at All Tiers: Government equity injection into primary, central, and apex institutions (up to 51% shares) to provide financial muscle without micro-managing day-to-day autonomy.
  • Credit-Marketing Linkage: Disbursement linked to crop production (Crop Loan System); borrowers market produce through cooperative marketing societies, which deduct loan installments automatically.
  • Creation of the State Bank of India: Nationalization of the Imperial Bank of India under the SBI Act, 1955, mandating massive rural branch expansion to facilitate remittance of cooperative funds.
  • National Funds in RBI: Creation of National Agricultural Credit (Long-term Operations) Fund and Stabilization Fund to convert short-term crop loans into medium-term loans during natural calamities.
2004–2006

Vaidyanathan Committee

Recommended ₹13,500 crore revival package for STCCS/LTCCS contingent on legal reforms: withdrawing state equity below 25%, eliminating government nominees, applying Banking Regulation Act under RBI/NABARD, and enforcing ‘Fit and Proper’ criteria for CEOs.

2011

97th Constitutional Amendment

Inserted Article 19(1)(c) making formation of cooperatives a Fundamental Right; added Article 43B (DPSP); inserted Part IX-B (Articles 243ZH–243ZT) mandating max 21 directors, 2 reserved seats for women, 1 for SC/ST, 5-year terms, and max 6-month supersession.

July 2021

Ministry of Cooperation

Created by Union Government under the vision “Sahakar Se Samriddhi” (Prosperity through Cooperation). Core projects: nationwide computerization of 63,000 PACS onto cloud ERP, Model Bye-laws enabling PACS as Common Service Centres (CSCs), and 3 new national multi-state apex cooperatives.

Unit 2.2: Principles of Co-operation: Four Historical Evolutionary Stages

Cooperative principles are the essential guidelines, ethical norms, and operational rules by which cooperatives put their core values into daily practice. Unlike commercial corporations governed solely by the Companies Act and profit motives, cooperatives are socio-economic institutions whose legal validity, internal governance, and socio-economic integrity depend on unwavering adherence to these universally acknowledged tenets across four historic epochs:

Stage 1: Rochdale Principles (1844)

Rochdale

Formulated by the 28 Rochdale flannel weavers in Lancashire: 1. Democratic Control (“One Member, One Vote”); 2. Open Membership; 3. Sale at Market Prices; 4. Pure Cash Trading; 5. Patronage Dividend (“Divi”); 6. Fixed, Limited Interest on Capital (5%); 7. Pure and Unadulterated Goods; 8. Political & Religious Neutrality; 9. Statutory Education Fund (2.5%).

Stage 2: First ICA Reformulation (Paris 1937)

15th Congress

Bifurcated Rochdale practices into two distinct categories:
Essential Principles (4): Open Membership, Democratic Control, Patronage Dividend, and Limited Interest on Capital (mandatory for ICA affiliation).
Non-Essential Principles (3): Political/Religious Neutrality, Cash Trading, and Education (advisory guidelines).

Stage 3: Karve Committee (Vienna 1966)

23rd Congress

Chaired by eminent Indian economist Prof. D.G. Karve. Formulated six modernized principles: 1. Open and Voluntary Membership; 2. Democratic Administration; 3. Limited Interest on Share Capital; 4. Equitable Disposal of Surplus; 5. Education and Training; and 6. Cooperation among Cooperatives (epochal Karve innovation to prevent cooperatives from being crushed by multinational monopolies).

Stage 4: Manchester Centennial (1995)

Centennial

Drafted by commission under Canadian scholar Prof. Ian MacPherson. Adopted the Statement on the Cooperative Identity (SCI), encompassing: Authoritative Definition, 6 Core Values (Self-help, Self-responsibility, Democracy, Equality, Equity, Solidarity), 4 Ethical Values (Honesty, Openness, Social Responsibility, Caring for Others), and Seven Universal Principles.

The Seven Modern Cooperative Principles (ICA Manchester 1995)

1st PrincipleVoluntary and Open Membership

Cooperatives are voluntary organizations, open to all persons able to use their services and willing to accept member responsibilities, without gender, social, racial, political, or religious discrimination.

2nd PrincipleDemocratic Member Control

Members actively participate in setting policies and making decisions. Men and women serving as elected representatives are accountable to the membership. Primary cooperatives strictly observe “one member, one vote.”

3rd PrincipleMember Economic Participation

Members contribute equitably to, and democratically control, capital. Surpluses are allocated to indivisible reserves, patronage refunds proportional to transactions, and community activities.

4th PrincipleAutonomy and Independence

Cooperatives are autonomous self-help organizations. If entering agreements with governments or raising external capital, they do so on terms ensuring member democratic control and preserving cooperative autonomy.

5th PrincipleEducation, Training, and Information

Cooperatives provide education and training for members, elected representatives, managers, and employees. They inform the general public—especially youth and opinion leaders—about cooperation.

6th PrincipleCooperation among Cooperatives

Cooperatives serve members most effectively and strengthen the movement by working together through local, national, regional, and international structures, building a unified cooperative commonwealth.

7th Principle (New 1995 Mandate)Concern for Community

Cooperatives work for the sustainable development of their communities through policies approved by their members—institutionalizing environmental protection, local employment, and social welfare.

Comparative Synthesis Matrix Across the Four Evolutionary Stages

DimensionRochdale (1844)ICA Paris (1937)Karve / Vienna (1966)Manchester (1995)
MembershipOpen, character-basedOpen (Essential)Voluntary & Open without discriminationVoluntary & Open (Universal equality)
GovernanceOne member, one voteDemocratic control (Essential)Democratic administration (Primary & Federal)Democratic Member Control (Accountability)
Trading TermsStrictly cash tradingCash trading (Non-essential)Omitted as operational detailOmitted; covered by autonomy and prudence
Inter-CooperationUnstated in original rulesNot formalizedFormalized 6th PrincipleReinforced as global strategic necessity
Community / EcologyIndirect social goalNot articulatedGeneral social purposeFormalized 7th Principle: Concern for Community

Unit 2.3: The International Cooperative Alliance (ICA)

1. Genesis, Historical Evolution, and London Foundation (1895)

The International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) is the non-governmental apex confederation uniting, representing, and serving cooperatives worldwide. Founded in London on August 19, 1895, during the First Co-operative Congress, it is one of the oldest and largest non-governmental federations in human history.

Visionary cooperative statesmen such as Edward Vansittart Neale (General Secretary of the British Co-operative Union), George Jacob Holyoake (historian of Rochdale), Charles Gide (renowned French cooperative economist), and Earl of Grey assembled delegates from Britain, France, Italy, Denmark, and the Netherlands to establish a global forum for international cooperative exchange, peace advocacy, and trade collaboration.

The ICA's headquarters were originally located in London, later relocated to Geneva, Switzerland, and are currently established in Brussels, Belgium.

Statutory Objectives Under the ICA Bylaws

  • Promote & Defend Cooperative Identity: Preserve, update, and propagate the Statement on the Cooperative Identity (Values and Principles) worldwide.
  • Global Advocacy & Representation: Represent the cooperative sector before global intergovernmental bodies, including the United Nations (holding General Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council - ECOSOC since 1946), the International Labour Organization (ILO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the World Bank.
  • Foster International Economic Collaboration: Catalyze trade, financial transfers, and technical transfer between national cooperative federations.
  • Sustainable Human Development: Champion poverty eradication, gender equality, environmental stewardship, and world peace through member-driven cooperative action.

2. Global Governance Architecture of the ICA

Tier 1

General Assembly (Supreme Organ)

The highest decision-making authority of the ICA, convening annually. Composed of official delegates from all Full Member organizations. Elects the Global President, approves changes to ICA Bylaws, sets global strategic policy, and formally validates amendments to Cooperative Principles.

Tier 2

Global Board of Directors

The executive governing body responsible for ongoing oversight between General Assemblies. Consists of the President, four Regional Vice-Presidents, representatives of sectoral bodies, youth representatives, gender equality representatives, and at-large elected directors.

Tier 3

Four Regional Organizations

  • ICA Asia-Pacific (ICA-AP): Regional Office in New Delhi, India.
  • ICA Africa: Regional Office located in Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Cooperatives Europe: Headquartered in Brussels, Belgium.
  • Cooperatives of the Americas: Regional Office in San José, Costa Rica.
Tier 4

Eight Specialized Sectoral Bodies

  • ICBA: International Co-operative Banking Association
  • ICMIF: International Co-operative & Mutual Insurance Federation
  • ICAO: International Co-operative Agricultural Organisation
  • CICOPA: Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers' Co-ops
  • CCW: Consumer Co-operatives Worldwide; CHI: Housing; ICFO: Fisheries

Specialized Thematic Committees of the ICA

Gender Equality Committee (GEC): Promotes equal female representation on cooperative boards.
ICA Youth Network: Inspires youth-led cooperatives and university entrepreneurship curricula.
Cooperative Law Committee: Advises national legislatures on modern pro-cooperative statutes.
Committee on Cooperative Research: Publishes the annual World Cooperative Monitor.

Comprehensive Module Summary Matrix

Exam Revision EssentialsKey Milestones & Jurisprudence
Theme / InstitutionKey Milestones & Landmark FiguresCore Institutional Legacy
Indian Cooperative OriginsSir Frederick Nicholson (1895), Acts of 1904 & 1912, Maclagan (1914), Montagu-Chelmsford (1919)Evolution from single-purpose rural credit to multi-purpose federal system under provincial governance.
Post-Independence ReformsAIRCSC Gorwala (1954), Vaidyanathan (2005), 97th Const. Amend. (2011), Ministry of Cooperation (2021)Integrated rural credit, State partnership, constitutional fundamental right (Art 19(1)(c)), PACS computerization.
Four Stages of PrinciplesRochdale (1844), Paris (1937), Karve Commission (1966), Manchester (1995)Refinement into 7 universal principles: Open membership, Democracy, Capital limit, Autonomy, Education, Inter-cooperation, Community.
International Cooperative AllianceLondon 1895, ECOSOC consultative status, 4 Regions, 8 Sectoral Bodies, Brussels HQSupreme global custodian of cooperative jurisprudence, representing over 1 billion members worldwide.
COM5EJ305Co-operative Theory & Practice

Download Module 2 Notes (PDF)

Calicut University • FYUGP 2024 Syllabus

Download PDF

Finished this module?

Continue reading the next module or return to the subject overview.